The author structures
the non-fiction article as a story. For instance,
there is a rising
action, climax, and conclusion. The rising action is when
the author is trying to
sign up for the competition. The climax is when he
is competing for the
Most Human Human Award. The conclusion is when the
author wins the
competition. When the author is narrating this he
incorporates research
and facts into it. So essentially it is a personal
narrative combined with
research. Another story element the author uses is
conflict. In every
fiction there is some type of conflict. In this article
the conflict is machines
vs humans and the competition.
I do recall the article.
I was actually interested when I first read it.
However, I hated the
fact that I had to write about it. U of M said that it had
to be processed a week
before my orientation or else I wouldn’t be able
to go to my orientation.
I had orientation on June 3 so I was in a hurry to finish this essay. The combination
of final exams, a math placement exam from U of M, and this 5 page paper made
me hate myself.
In a way, I do see it more differently.
Because of the college writing
course I have taken I
can finally sense the author’s voice and writing
style through his
writing. I can analyze the article much
more. Before,
I wouldn’t have been able
to do this. If I had this prompt again in
college I would delve
much deeper. I’m pretty sure my essay was broad when I wrote it for the self-placement
test. Now I would look at a specific point and analyze that one fact or notion.
I would find more textual support and be much more concise in my writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment